CVBT logo.

CVBT logo.

• How to spot the hidden technology reefs that could shipwreck your small business
• “You can be leveraging technology in the same way that a Fortune 500 company”

(Total Recorded Time is 13:35)

 

Let’s just add another major worry when it comes to keeping your small business afloat in these troubled times of recession and COVID pandemic. It’s trying to steer a company through the hidden reefs of using outdated software or hardware, says Michael Fillios, founder and CEO of the IT Ally Institute, a Mason, Ohio-based nonprofit organization helping small and medium-sized businesses.

“There’s a balance that you need to strike between keeping the lights on with technology investments as well as thinking about these investments mores strategically, ” says Mr. Fillios. “As we’ve learned in the most recent days with COVID, technology can really be utilized in more ways than we can ever imagine.

“You can be leveraging technology in the same way that a Fortune 500 company, ” Mt. Fillios says.

He warns that failure to pay attention to what he calls technology debt can run a company aground. “This now goes beyond just the traditional software defects into many other areas of a business including hardware and purchase application and talent and data and process,” he says.

Michael Fillios goes into detail about often overlooked problem and what business leaders should do about it in this exclusive CVBT Audio Interview Podcast via Skype:

Please click here to listen: https://tinyurl.com/y2hjm7ev

Mr. Fillios is author of the new book, “Tech Debt 2.0®: How to Future Proof Your Small Business and Improve Your Tech Bottom Line, ” (IT Ally Institute; 2020).

[This article was originally published on the americanbizradio.net.]

Michael C. Fillios, the Founder and CEO of the IT Ally Institute, a nonprofit organization providing small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) access to knowledge, research, and practical tools to improve their tech bottom line joins Enterprise Radio. His new book is called: Tech Debt 2.0®: How to Future Proof Your Small Business and Improve Your Tech Bottom Line.

This episode of Enterprise Radio is working in conjunction with the Author Channel.

Listen to host Eric Dye & guest Michael C. Fillios discuss the following:

  1. The concept of technical debt has been around for several decades as it relates to managing software defects.  How is Tech Debt 2.0 different and why was it important to expand the definition?
  2. As we know from financial debt, it is not all bad if deliberate for example in establishing credit worthiness.  Similarly, not all technical debt is bad. In your book you define 3 types of Tech Debt 2.0, can you explain them and how they differ.
  3. Many internal users and external customers have experienced the impact of Tech Debt 2.0, however, the underlying symptoms are not always acknowledged. What are the symptoms in your organization that would potentially indicate signs of Tech Debt 2.0 and is there a root cause based on your research?
  4. In your book, you introduce the Tech Debt 2.0 diagnostic.  What does this tool measure and how can this information be used to manage Tech Debt 2.0?
  5. How does the impact of Tech Debt 2.0 factor in when it comes to buying or selling a business or during the IT due diligence process?

Michael C. Fillios is the Founder and CEO of the IT Ally Institute, a nonprofit organization providing small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) access to knowledge, research, and practical tools to improve their tech bottom line. A senior global business and technology executive with more than 25 years of experience in IT, finance, operations management, and change leadership, he lives in Mason, Ohio. He is the author of: Tech Debt 2.0®: How to Future Proof Your Small Business and Improve Your Tech Bottom Line.

Website: www.itallyinstitute.org

Social Media Links: Twitter: @mcfillios LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/michaelfillios Facebook: facebook.com/itallyllc [This article was originally published on epodcastnetwork.com.]

Michael Fillios joins Jim Blasingame to reveal the concept of “tech debt”, which is a 3-factor condition of allowing the cost of technology to move in a direction that doesn’t serve your evolving business model.

Listen below to learn more.

2020 has brought business leaders challenges, undercutting established business plans and negating processes and practices leaders have developed and relied on for the health and success of their business. The pandemic and resulting economic disruption have taken a toll on all businesses, but especially small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs), which typically do not have the resources available to large enterprises.

In this environment, technology is a double-edged sword, presenting an existential threat and, at the same time, an opportunity to reevaluate and reposition a business for competition in a changed world. Size and agility can work in favor of the SMB that is not burdened with entrenched technology permeating processes spread across many functional areas.

Repositioning a business will mean developing new capabilities. But, just as important is reevaluating, reprioritizing and purging obsolete, dysfunctional infrastructure and systems that no longer move the business in the desired direction at the right cost and proper speed. This means managing technical debt in a business.

Technical debt, or Tech Debt, is similar to financial debt, but paying it down drains internal resources as opposed to paying interest and principle to a bank. Tech Debt costs a business time, project funding, staff turnover and competitive standing. It can accumulate silently and become a threat to the future of a business.

Staying on top of Tech Debt is especially difficult for SMBs that might not have the technology departments, CIOs and CTOs of larger organizations. However, a successful campaign to manage Tech Debt can benefit from the assistance and guidance of outside resources that can extend your enterprise.

Assessment of technology currently used by a business can best be accomplished by an independent party who is not influenced by past history, pride of ownership or a protectionist bias.

A substantial portion of infrastructure and applications adopted by businesses in the last ten years and earlier is obsolete, functionality insufficient or supported at costs far out of proportion to the benefits provided. Servers, storage systems, some proprietary network and communications equipment, proprietary applications systems for back office, customer relations, sales and email have all evolved to alternative solutions that are cloud-based, shared, secure, on-demand, off-premise and third-party supported.

Independent, experienced firms and individuals with no interest in promoting any one solution are poised to provide their expertise to help SMBs differentiate real technology advances from technology-of-the day solutions. They have years of experience working in finance and technology with large and small companies and have helped develop technology management strategies that position these businesses for the future.

These resources represent a continuing trend in today’s workplace. The gig economy provides supertemps and experienced executives who have left corporate positions and become greypeneurs. They provide not only fractional services as traditional consultants but also often as virtual CIOs, CFOs or CTOs, available on-demand to fill these roles for SMBs and help manage technology investment and technology strategies for the future.

49 percent of self-employed workers are baby boomers who want to share their important life experiences and give back to businesses, especially SMBs, that appeal to their natural inclination toward independence and self-reliance.

Another path open to SMBs addressing Tech Debt is collaboration. There can be substantial value in a collective approach to addressing shared issues.

Collaboration opportunities come in a variety of forms and have different advantages. User groups foster collaboration among similar organizations sharing a particular technology or even a particular brand or product. These groups can exert powerful influence on the evolution and future direction of a technology. Industry sectors have broader, collaborative trade associations that address issues shared by businesses in that sector.

Geographically structured organizations such as regional chambers of commerce provide forums to inform and educate business leaders, promoting cross pollination and the sharing of ideas. A unique benefit of such organizations is the insight they provide to businesses confronting new issues or adopting technology early on, helping the community foresee issues and emerging trends. Collaboration allows an SMB to monitor competitive businesses and benchmark key performance indicators, including the variables that contribute to Tech Debt.

Today’s constraints on small and medium-sized businesses provide some advantages over established larger businesses heavily invested in the past and with large internal staffs needed to support processes and practices that have evolved over time. These larger companies are feeling pressure to look more like SMBs.

“The prevalence of lean management teams, the post-recession drive to cap costs, and the accelerating pace of change combine to make temporary solutions compelling,” as authors Jody Greenstone Miller and Matt Miller observe in their Harvard Business Review article, “The Rise of the Supertemp.” Extending the SMB enterprise through judicious use of external resources can be an effective and efficient means to manage Tech Debt and prepare for the future health and resilience of the business.

Here are some pointers to help when enlisting the assistance of external resources:

An independent perspective is a big advantage assessing the state of an organization. Use a combination of internal knowledge and outside perspective to evaluate the infrastructure, systems, processes, staff and technology investment strategy of the business.

Know the people, services and expertise level available to your business. Consider outsourcing non-core competencies and infrastructure components. Prepare for and use the shared and scalable cloud resources to limit capital and operating expense.

Become familiar with fractional expertise resources–virtual C-suite staff. Consider their use on major tech projects, investment planning, M&A due diligence and more.

Develop and use collaboration strategies with an ecosystem of providers, advisors, organizations and partners.

Lastly, value the resources that serve you the way you would have your customers value you. Do not underestimate the ability and willingness of people to understand and address your issues.

[This article was originally published on smallbizclub.com.]

Years of experience working in finance and technology at large, mid-sized, and small businesses have taught me that business leaders face real challenges managing the technology their company needs to operate effectively and stay competitive. This is especially the case for small and mid-sized businesses (SMBs), which typically do not have the resources available to large enterprises. The challenge has grown significantly in recent years as businesses have adopted technologies to meet the expectations of their customers and to compete for advantage in the digital world.

The challenge is not necessarily in deploying new applications or platforms but in managing investment in technology and balancing that investment with other business priorities. Striking that balance means recognizing and managing technical debt.

Technical debt is similar to the financial debt a business can incur through salary and benefit commitments, plant and equipment payments, and loans. But there are critical differences. Unlike financial debt, technical debt is not paid to outsiders: It is debt a business owes internally that needs to be paid with internal resources such as time, diverted funding, market opportunity, and competitive standing. Also, unlike financial debt, technical debt is not clearly identified by the reporting built into a business’ financial and accounting practices. Unless it is routinely monitored and measured, it can accumulate unchecked and become a destructive threat to the future of a business.

Initially, technical debt was defined as defective code released to rush a product to market. Today with the widespread adoption of technology, the expanded definition of tech debt, or Tech Debt 2.0®, includes any liability incurred in the development, acquisition, use, and retirement of technology, from hardware and software systems to the skillsets needed to support them. Just like the evolution of technology over the past several decades has occurred from mainframe to client server to the internet and now the cloud, Tech Debt 2.0 has steadily grown smarter, stealthier, and more sinister.

Tech Debt 2.0 can be broken down into three main types:

Unplanned Tech Debt is unintentional. It typically stems from flawed practices, such as insufficiently trained code developers using overly complicated, undocumented, and unsupervised coding techniques. Poor communication between parties in preparation of requirement specifications and unforeseen changes to product requirements can also be factors. Unplanned tech debt often occurs in the beginning stages of a project and, if recognized, can be corrected without overhauling or scrubbing a project.

Creeping Tech Debt is sneaky. It may initially be non-existent in a new application or piece of hardware infrastructure. Over time though, obsolescence takes its toll. Changes to the needs or size of the user base reveal weakness in the design. Performance issues begin to increase. Increased incidents of downtime and time spent on maintenance drain the productivity and morale of technicians and engineers. At the same time, CTOS and CIOs face an uphill battle convincing the C-Suite to invest in replacing an infrastructure that has worked in the past and continues to work, if not optimally.

The way to combat creeping tech debt is to highlight the creep and its costs. Track time spent on staff performing rework, doing maintenance, and fixing the same issues over and over again. Track the time this work takes away from progress on new projects and product development. Measure the number and duration of failures. Communicate the effect of these incidents on customers to departments throughout the business. Correlate rework time and downtime to staff turnover and productivity measures. Benchmark technology performance and investment against industry best practices. Periodically review application and equipment portfolios. Know and communicate the life cycle status of the business’ technology. Include phone systems, physical plant and electrical components.

Intentional Tech Debt has the potential to be good for a business — if approached with balance. There is a constant tug of war and tension between marketing and technical development. Marketing product managers want to move product to customers as quickly as possible. That is key to capturing market share and gaining competitive advantage. Technology developers want all the time and information necessary to design, build, and test products of the highest quality with all the performance characteristics and capabilities a customer could envision. Give developers their way and the “perfect” product might well be late to market and just one of a number of similar products among leading competitors. Oh, and in the time it took to build and exhaustively QA that product, customer requirements might well have shifted.

A middle ground addresses time-to-market considerations while delivering customers a minimally viable product, with full disclosure that it lacks certain desirable features or may contain “bugs.” Accepting intentional tech debt has let the product get to market first or, at least, early. It has let customers benefit from the initial product capability and has given them a powerful voice in the product’s evolution, letting their user experience refine further requirements and priorities. Intentional tech debt has recruited the customer as a key part of future development and freed the technology developers to concentrate on evolving features instead of trying to discern from afar what the customer might want next. Tech debt deployed in this manner places the technology developer in the perfect position to exercise the agile methodology.

Different kinds of Tech Debt 2.0 lurk in all kinds of businesses, and even the most brilliant among us can miss what’s right in front of us. Like other business disciplines, technology departments require monitoring, measurement, and management. Implementing a comprehensive diagnostic provides unique insights into the causes of Tech Debt 2.0 and highlights areas that need improvement. The results reflect your company’s level of technomic health:

  • Excellent: Tech Debt 2.0 is being proactively managed jointly by the business and the tech team with a strong focus on innovation and customer experience while maintaining operational excellence.
  • Good: Tech Debt 2.0 is proactively managed jointly by the business and the tech team and shows little or no negative impact on business performance.
  • Fair: Tech Debt 2.0 management is a mix of reactive and proactive, is led by the tech team, and shows some signs of negative impact on business performance.
  • Poor: Tech Debt 2.0 is reactively managed by the tech team and has significant impact on business performance.

Beyond any specific technology or group of technologies, Tech Debt 2.0 is about awareness of the role technology investment plays in determining the viability, success, and existence of an enterprise. Effective Tech Debt 2.0 management enables reaching a balance of investment and prioritization over time and in response to the dynamically changing environment — a priority for not only the CIO but all C-Suite occupants and stakeholders.

[This article was originally published on builtin.com.]